Lab notebook · chapter 5 of 7 · page 1 of 2

Small caps and turnover

Why the capacity argument defeats itself, and what slowing down revealed.

The small-cap test

The capacity argument said a small account's structural edge lives where institutions cannot trade. Every failure above happened in 112 mega-caps, so that argument was never actually tested. 109 small/mid caps, hand-picked and therefore maximally survivorship-biased, at 23x lower dollar volume (median $39.8M/day against $919M).

momentum equal-weight index edge vs EW maxDD Sharpe
large cap (111) +361.7% +324.3% SPY +262.7% +37.4% 27.5% 1.04
small cap (109) +374.1% +360.9% IWM +134.4% +13.3% 44.5% 0.82

The edge is smaller, not larger. Drawdown is far worse and Sharpe is lower.

And the survivorship contamination is worse too: equal-weighting my hand-picked small caps returned +360.9% against IWM's +134.4% — a +226 point construction premium, against +150 for the large-cap set. Hand-recalling small caps selects survivors hard, and 6 of 116 tickers had already delisted, roughly 3x the large-cap attrition.

Why the capacity argument fails

Breakeven half-spread against equal-weighting the same universe:

breakeven measured
large cap 6.76 bps 2.40 bps — clears it
small cap 4.08 bps 14.27 bps — 3.5x over

Measured 2026-09-09 on the live feed. Quoted half-spread by universe:

median p25 p75 p90 max
large cap 1.91 1.12 3.12 4.50 9.16
small cap 10.02 4.88 18.79 29.56 53.49 (ATNI)

Trade-weighted for what momentum actually buys: 14.27 bps — worse than the universe median, because momentum's picks skew toward the thinner, more volatile names. Against a 4.08 bps breakeven, the +13.3% edge becomes −73.5%.

The argument was self-defeating and it took running it to see why. Institutions avoid these names because the trading costs are prohibitive. Those same costs apply to a $100k account running 26x annual turnover. The friction that protects an anomaly from arbitrage also consumes it for you — you do not get to collect an edge that exists only because collecting it is too expensive.

A low-turnover strategy might reach it. A weekly rebalance cannot.